Martin Hohenberg

Why Radio Is Dying (And What a Top 1000 Week Gets Right)

Every morning, my day begins with the same sound: my local radio station. But not in a good way. It’s the same fifteen songs. Over and over. Sometimes at the exact same time as the day before. It’s live-moderated — this isn’t some pre-programmed robot feed — but the experience might as well be. It feels more like passive noise management than a curated, human experience.

And yet… every fall, for one glorious week, this very station shows that it knows how to do better.

The Decline of Radio Isn’t About Technology

It’s easy to blame Spotify, YouTube, or podcasts for the decline of radio. But the truth cuts deeper: radio is killing itself by becoming less human, less surprising, and less diverse.

When stations rotate the same 15 songs all day long, they aren’t serving music lovers. They’re optimizing for one thing: retention through repetition. It’s a strategy based on keeping listeners just long enough for the next ad break, not on delighting or engaging them.

Live Moderation ≠ Real Curation

You’d think that having a live team would make a difference. It doesn’t. Most live radio today is little more than a talking wrapper around an algorithmically optimized playlist. The DJs are present, but the soul of the music? Not so much. They don’t curate, they manage.

This is not a lack of capability — it’s a failure of imagination.

The Top 1000 Week: A Glimpse Into Radio’s Lost Potential

Every autumn, my local station runs a week-long special: a listener-voted Top 1000. It’s diverse. It’s fun. It’s nostalgic. It’s fresh. It brings deep cuts, old favorites, surprises, and passion back into the airwaves. It is so popular some people take vacations and forgoe sleep to listen to the radio for as long as possible - imagine that!

And during that week, something magical happens: I stop skipping the radio. I listen. I enjoy. I feel like part of something.

That one week out of the year proves the point: when stations treat listeners like people with curiosity and taste — not just statistical models to be herded through predictable content — they create something worth tuning in for.

What This All Reveals

  • Radio isn’t dying because Spotify exists.
    It’s dying because it has become a worse version of Spotify—on shuffle, with ads, and no control.

  • Listeners are smarter than the system allows for.
    The Top 1000 proves it. Give people a voice and they bring gold.

  • Live radio could be powerful—if it dared to be personal again.

How Radio Could Save Itself

Here’s how radio could win us back:

  • Rotate deeper into archives—even within popular genres
  • Allow live moderators to build their own curated segments
  • Introduce thematic, mood-based, or community-driven hours
  • Spotlight underplayed or local artists
  • Use AI to broaden diversity, not collapse it into sameness

But doing so requires a mindset shift: from treating listeners like data to treating them like humans.

In Conclusion: We’re Not Tired of Radio. We’re Tired of Being Ignored.

Radio isn’t doomed. It’s asleep at the wheel.

That Top 1000 week? It’s proof of life. A reminder that when radio remembers what it is—human connection through sound—it still matters.

All we want is for it to wake up.

Published on